To People Who Think Systems Exist In SportsBetting

[Bronson7]

There is no systematic explanation to expose the outcome of sports betting.
There isnt anyone at Harvard, NASA, or the russian space station who have figured out a system for sports betting!

If anyone seriously, and i mean seriously has a system that hits atleast 65%+, than i want to crunch the numbers and find out.

But i haven't come across one that hasn't sucked

[Bobtheicon]

How about Martingale betting on a good team with unlimited funds?

[revnecro1273]

something that i looked at last night was hockey games listed at the espn streak for cash...take the team with the least amount of people on it..believe that since election day it lost 3 times

[Wellahiya]

Originally Posted by revnecro1273

something that i looked at last night was hockey games listed at the espn streak for cash...take the team with the least amount of people on it..believe that since election day it lost 3 times

yep... fading the makority (wich are mug cappers) isn't the worst thing in most sports.

[revnecro1273]

Originally Posted by eekchac

yep... fading the makority (wich are mug cappers) isn't the worst thing in most sports.

you got it...works with the other sports too on that thing, but not as well as with hockey

[BigdaddyQH]

If there was a system that worked, the books would find a way to ban it.

[revnecro1273]

unranked fave (unseeded fave in tennis) works pretty well

[huscroft6]

Originally Posted by BigdaddyQH

If there was a system that worked, the books would find a way to ban it.

Dude you cant ban betting on certain teams in certain circumstances. For instance if a Chase system worked how would you ban it?!?!

[revnecro1273]

Originally Posted by huscroft6

Dude you cant ban betting on certain teams in certain circumstances. For instance if a Chase system worked how would you ban it?!?!

LOL...you tell him man..dude thinks it is something like the MIT group or some shit

[Nevada]

I do have a system... for mlb o/u's... back dated it to 1996 and had really good profits every year. used it for 2 years now. It involves 2 systems. One system tells you which games to bet on, and the other one tells you the amount to bet.

[Badger28]

Originally Posted by Nevada

I do have a system... for mlb o/u's... back dated it to 1996 and had really good profits every year. used it for 2 years now. It involves 2 systems. One system tells you which games to bet on, and the other one tells you the amount to bet.

Care to share Nevada?

[dave nz]

My sports betting methods for all sports have a series of between 5-9 sophisticated systems/methods, different for different sports. Which I've spent a good deal of my life developing. When and only when a significant number matchup eg 5/6, 6/7, 7/8 is when I place a bet. All methods are as important as each other....without any of them and it would be not as profitable. Proof they work? look at my signiture

and before anyone asks no I don't tell anyone them....turned down a large contract bookmaking because I wasn't willing to spill all.....left the Bookmaker.com/?cmpid=4437" target="_blank">Bookmaker on good terms he completely understands.

[THE_ROOKIEEE]

My System Is Simple....find The 5 Highest Consensus Teams..... Then Find Out Of Those Who Has The Biggest Trends Going For Them And Eliminate 2 Of Them ....then With The 3 Left Check Around Forums With The Better Handicappers And Eliminate One Of The Last 3..... Out Of The Last Two That Are Remaining Just Flip A Coin Cause After All This Hard Work Who Cares As It Is A 50/50 Shot Already!!!!

[revnecro1273]

wait til halftime and if the team that gets no love from the consensus, take that team in the 2nd half if they are losing

[Bronson7]

I will always be on the look out for anything that can spell a good enough profit, but that day hasn't arrived yet and not one person has come up with a legitimate system. I haven't been proven wrong yet, so as i said, systems do not exist.