Go Back   Sports Handicapping Forum > Welcome Forums > Main Street

Main Street Gambling forums, online sportsbooks, players talk, sports talk, offshore betting, poker, off-topic, etc!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-09-2007, 08:49 AM
Your 2012 NBA champs
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 59,184
Rewards: 1,244
LA Times: Get rid of Online Gambling Restrictions

The Los Angeles Times had a very nice editorial Sunday on online gambling.



Get rid of gambling restrictions



The U.S. doesn't mind the lottery, but when it comes to sports betting across interstate or international boundaries, all bets are off. They shouldn't be.



ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA, former British colonies on the eastern edge of the Caribbean Sea, are smaller than Los Angeles and less populous than Burbank. Yet they may be able to force the world's most powerful government to change its gambling laws.



Not since 1960 has it been legal under federal law to place or take bets on sports using interstate or international phone lines. The Federal Wire Act of 1961 and subsequent measures also have been interpreted to ban online gambling as well, or at least gambling on sports. At issue is whether those laws constitute "arbitrary and unjustifiable discrimination" against foreign firms.



Do they? Antigua and Barbuda argue that they do — and the World Trade Organization agrees. So do we.



Realistically, the ban has had little effect. It hasn't stopped Americans from betting (and losing) millions of dollars at online casinos and bookmaking operations based in other countries. Nevertheless, U.S. policy has irritated many of its trading partners, including Antigua and Barbuda, which asked the WTO in 2003 to rule that U.S. gambling restrictions violated an international treaty governing trade in services.



Eventually, in 2005, a WTO appeals panel accepted the U.S. argument that its gambling restrictions were needed to protect public order and morals. But by permitting off-track betting parlors in the U.S., the WTO ruled, Congress created an exception to the ban on remote gambling that discriminated against foreign Bookmakers. After two more years of wrangling over what the panel's order meant, a WTO tribunal ruled late last month that the U.S. remained out of compliance.



So the U.S. faces trade sanctions from the WTO unless Congress does one of two things: Either acknowledge that betting on horses from overseas is no greater threat to the nation's moral fiber than it is at an OTB parlor, or make OTB parlors illegal.



Maybe it doesn't have the stomach for either. If so, then Antigua and Barbuda may want to ask the WTO to ponder why allowing the interstate sale of lottery tickets — a form of state-sponsored gambling — is any less hypocritical than the U.S. stance on thoroughbreds and trotters.



LA Times Editorial
__________________
Jack
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2007, 10:59 AM
Muffin Man
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YUKON
Posts: 2,922
Rewards: 914
BRAVO




stop the hypocrisy
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-09-2007, 11:25 AM
Mod-A-Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: rochester ny
Posts: 15,800
Rewards: 1,725
Yeah you fawkers.. LEAVE US ALONE !!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2007, 05:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 750
Rewards: 0
agreed. legalize it to let the us based casinos into the game, and bang you can get what you really want, taxes.
__________________
records deleted due to incompetence.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.