pittviper

[sweets]

since you must not have enough sense to pull up the original thread labeled
"Tracking thread only" I bumped it up for you. So quit talking out of your A$$

[Dr. Jack]

I moved this to the basement.

GL

[sweets]

no problem Dr. Jack . I just can't get him to understand that Cincinnati was a play. Please tell him to stay out of my threads and I'll do the same to his

[seth25]

OK.......You said they were a play. He said they weren't.You bet Cincy and won. Who Cares? LMAO,this is some little kid chit here.

[mrwho]

how about we just have a rapoff between the both of ya?

[dave nz]

Originally Posted by MrWho

how about we just have a rapoff between the both of ya?

sweets -200

pittviper +155

[Deck]

most updated photo of pitt

[pittviper]

Day #1
My bad on the LAA play should have been a "NO PLAY" . Still learning the details myself and got one of his specific details wrong. He is 2-0 \ +200.00

the game finished and loss, you are 2-1.. and you come in and post that that it was a mistake, so the system is 2-0.. ? and then you start next days thread saying the system is 2-0.. and then I call you out on it, and to save yourself you go fine i'll make it 2-1..

if your cancelling a play, do it before the game starts is all, not after its over and finished, and lost..

gl, and I was never bashing you as an individual, just wanted you to know that when you post a play and it losses.. just because you made a mistake and it shouldn't have been a play, doesn't mean you can throw it away as a no-play, the game is over.. put it in your record and move on GL

and then you start the next days thread

[pittviper]

Originally Posted by sweets

no problem Dr. Jack . I just can't get him to understand that Cincinnati was a play. Please tell him to stay out of my threads and I'll do the same to his

and i know Cincinnati was a play, I don't care about that... I cared about the legitamacy of your record.. everyday boston has played they've been a play, thats the point I was trying to get at..

[Bobtheicon]

The problem stems from not knowing the "system".
If the loss indeed was not a system play and that could be proven by running the numbers in the system, then I would say that you wouldn't have to count the loss because it didn't fit in the system. But without divulging the system, we have to take your word for it - and it is more difficult to take your word if the play or no play comes out after the final score.

[mrwho]

Originally Posted by dave nz

sweets -200

pittviper +155

damn someone hammered the overnight line...sweets up to -295 now...