Chargers Vincent Jackson suspended 3 Games

[ConstantColorUpor]

Hey Vincent see you week 4. The demise of the Chargers is already starting, I love it!

[rjb1816]

i can tell by this post you follow sports very closely

[ConstantColorUpor]

I dont even know what that is supposed to mean, I do follow sports very closely and this is news that broke today. Although he was planning on sitting out anyways, its now official that he was suspended for 3 but prob reduced to 2 games. And I dont think hes getting traded. So although you need to have some success to see a demise, I think this cements them as a .500 team at best.

[BigFratDaddy]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

Hey Vincent see you week 4. The demise of the Chargers is already starting, I love it!

you cant have a demise if youve always sucked

[rjb1816]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

I dont even know what that is supposed to mean, I do follow sports very closely and this is news that broke today. Although he was planning on sitting out anyways, its now official that he was suspended for 3 but prob reduced to 2 games. And I dont think hes getting traded. So although you need to have some success to see a demise, I think this cements them as a .500 team at best.

sure guy

he's been planning on sitting out the suspension is irrelevant. good effort on the thread tho. bet they finish over .500?

[Romanowski]

Ill lay a dime to your dime that the chargers finish better than 8-8

jack can hold the 2 dimes

u ready?

[ConstantColorUpor]

Originally Posted by rjb1816

sure guy

he's been planning on sitting out the suspension is irrelevant. good effort on the thread tho. bet they finish over .500?

Planning on sitting out and sitting out are 2 completely different things. The suspension is far from irrelvant because now he has no choice, hes ****ing out. And no I wont bet they finish over .500 because that division could be won by a Pee Wee team which means the Chargers still have a shot.

[JETMAN]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

Planning on sitting out and sitting out are 2 completely different things. The suspension is far from irrelvant because now he has no choice, hes ****ing out. And no I wont bet they finish over .500 because that division could be won by a Pee Wee team which means the Chargers still have a shot.

And no I wont bet they finish over .500 because that division could be won by a Pee Wee team

[rjb1816]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

Planning on sitting out and sitting out are 2 completely different things. The suspension is far from irrelvant because now he has no choice, hes ****ing out. And no I wont bet they finish over .500 because that division could be won by a Pee Wee team which means the Chargers still have a shot.

1. i'd say its a pretty damn sure thing he will not be reporting anytime before week 10 without a contract

2. which is it? will they or wont they finish over .500? big talk, quick retraction

[chibob]

Originally Posted by rjb1816

1. i'd say its a pretty damn sure thing he will not be reporting anytime before week 10 without a contract

2. which is it? will they or wont they finish over .500? big talk, quick retraction

Just one small mention of the SDC and it's like you never spent time in the corner

I for one missed your attempts at making chit out of people

like welcome back Kotter

[ConstantColorUpor]

#1. Again that is your assumption, we have seen before that players do not follow through with their threats like this one from VJ. The only thing I was doing with this thread was eliminating ASSUMPTIONS on the first 3 games because that is in concrete now he will not be playing the first 2-3 games no matter what his intentions were.

#2 Its tough to say, they have a really soft division, by far the worst in football. They have lost their aging #1 back, now replaced by an unproven rookie. Their left tackle is threatening to hold out as is their #1 reciever (now out for 2-3 games) because neither wants to play for the FRA tender. Without these players I think they are 8-8 at best. Would I liek to bet on that, no, there is too much uncertainty surrounding this team and you never know what to expect from the soft division.

1@ Kansas City L
2 Jacksonville W
3 @ Seattle L
4 Arizona W
5 @ Oakland W
6 @ St. Louis W
7 New England L
8 Tennessee L
9 @ Houston L
10 BYE WEEK
11 Denver W
12 @ Indianapolis L
13 Oakland W
14 Kansas City W
15 San Francisco L
16 @ Cincinnati L
17 @ Denver W

[Romanowski]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

1@ Kansas City L are you joking?
2 Jacksonville W
3 @ Seattle L
4 Arizona W
5 @ Oakland W
6 @ St. Louis W
7 New England L
8 Tennessee L
9 @ Houston L
10 BYE WEEK
11 Denver W
12 @ Indianapolis L
13 Oakland W
14 Kansas City W
15 San Francisco L
16 @ Cincinnati L
17 @ Denver W

firstly you dont do this in evaluating a schedule, you dont go black or white on games, you give them a winning expectancy (however the method)

are you saying KC has a 100% chance of beating SD, give me a break

or NE has a 100% shot of winning in SD

please...I want your money lets do this

[rjb1816]

tennesse and sf winning in sd made me laugh...thx for that

[Bisket]

yeah 8-8 against that schedule

thanks for the notebook entry

[Romanowski]

how many years in a row is houstons year next year