|
|||||||
| Capping All handicapping, betting systems, spreadsheets, mathematics & quantitative technicapping. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
How do you make an NFL line?
I asked this in main street but thelink is right and this is probably the place to ask.
How do you set your own NFL line to compare it to what the spread really is? And if possible, will someone use an actual example to show maybe past opponents etc so that I can see what process you use instead of just listing the criteria? Also, is it the same for the NFL and NCAAF? thanks. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
sorry I missed this I already posted in the Main Street
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
there tends to be less exaggeration in the NFL. even if you see a blowout one week lines only go so high..
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
i saw it and thank you.....just wasn't sure exactly where the best place to post was
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
the best way is typically to find various statistics and run regressions onto the line, with an adequate sample size
i like to use the average line and find the difference between the two teams
__________________
"Nobody goes there anymore, its too crowded." --Yogi Berra "Always tell the truth, that way you won't have to remember what you said." --Mark Twain *=$50,000 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
would be interesting to run regressions on the head coaches/coordinators and see if you can gain any information/edge that way. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
well running regressions with fixed stats, those that determine victories regardless of coach
maybe teams with a high rushing YPA differential tend to win more games, or punt/kick return ability and net special teams, etc...
__________________
"Nobody goes there anymore, its too crowded." --Yogi Berra "Always tell the truth, that way you won't have to remember what you said." --Mark Twain *=$50,000 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
so you mean take the current line and alter it based on whichever stats you use to cap games?
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
use whichever variables more closely resemble the line
take maybe the last ten years, pick some statistics and regress onto the line and find a reasonable combination of correlation and margin of error that best fits the optimal standards set forth by a regression process
__________________
"Nobody goes there anymore, its too crowded." --Yogi Berra "Always tell the truth, that way you won't have to remember what you said." --Mark Twain *=$50,000 |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
use an inaccurate line, for example Sagarin, other computer systems, or lines that were influenced heavily by public money, then go 3 points in the opposite direction of the opening line. now you have a line that is statistically better than all of the above
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
^^
elegant, overly simple, yet with immense utility and explanatory power
__________________
"Nobody goes there anymore, its too crowded." --Yogi Berra "Always tell the truth, that way you won't have to remember what you said." --Mark Twain *=$50,000 |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
okay so to make sure i understand.....sagarin ratings pgh@tb PGH: 26.58 TB + Home field: 21.1+3.16 so it comes to pgh -2.32 so what do i do with that......the "right" line should then be PGH +1? |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
my point is the opening line is very accurate especially after several weeks in it beats other lines on average including the closing line. so if you notice Pitt opens at -3 and Sagarin and Statfox both say it should be a pk then Pitt could be a consideration for a play. i couldnt tell you how to put it into practice since its just an average. i dont have the bankroll to make betting worth the time spent researching right now so i just play parlays based on opinion |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have also come up with some good alternate lines before by using a formula similar to the one i posted in the other thread but using rushing off vs. rushing def and passing off vs. passing defense then assigning a point value per unit of yards gained
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
What are your guys' thoughts on Sagarin's predicted point-spreads and how to use them? Week 3 NFL, his plays were: Atlanta (Sagarin line +1, Real line +4)= Winner Outright Seattle (Sagarin line +2, Real line +4.5)= Winner Outright Buffalo (Sagarin line +11, Real line +14)= Winner Jax (Sagarin line -1, Real line +3) = Loser There were a few others week 3, but those were the main ones. Looking ahead to NFL week 4 - There are not many underdog plays like the previous week. Sagarin is suggesting (by some pretty wide margins) that it could be a favorite week. Thoughts? |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM.









Linear Mode
