2010 Baseball Streak System

[ConstantColorUpor]

So each of the last 3 years I have done a baseball system that operates based on win and loss streaks. Anyone who has bet baseball has probably heard or tried this system. After all baseball is a game of streaks and this system is very successful. A win streak is considered 3 in a row and vice versa.

Heres how it works: (ALL ARE MONEYLINE)

Scenario #1 Any team that is on a 3 game win streak, bet to win 1 unit on them
Scenario #2 Any team that is on a 3 game losing streak, bet to win 1 unit AGAINST them
Scenario #3 If any 2 teams play, 1 on a 3 game winning streak, 1 on a 3 game losing streak, bet to win 2 units on the team with the winning streak
Scenario #4 (added this last year and it was successful) If the home team is on a 3 game win streak, and the road team is on a 3 game losing streak, bet to win 3 units on the winning streak


* if at any time a team win a 3 game win streak is faces another on a 3 game win streak, NO BET. And same for losing streaks.

Today was the first day in which some teams qualified as system plays here is what they are with the result (sorry I missed today had family things) but from now on it will be posted prior to the 1st game each day. Good luck to all who follow.

[ConstantColorUpor]

System Plays for April 9: (Bold is who you are BETTING ON)
Minnesota -102 (3 Win) @ CWS
Oakland +125 (3 Win) @ LA Angels (3 Loss)
Seattle (3 Loss) @ Texas -125
Philly -170 @ Houston (3 Loss)
Atlanta @ San Fran +100 (3 Win)

Minn 102 to win 100 WIN +100
Oak 160 to win 200 WIN +200
Texas 125 to win 100 WIN +100
Philly 170 to win 100 WIN +100
San Fran 100 to win 100 WIN +100

Day #1 Total: 5-0 +600

[ConstantColorUpor]

System YTD: 5-0 +600
Plays for April 10: (all lines from bodog)

Minnesota -130 (won 4) @ CWS (lost 3)
Philly -145 @ Houston (lost 4)
Sea (lost 4) @ Texas +125
Toronto +125 (won 3) @ Baltimore
Boston (lost 3) @ Kansas City +100
Oakland +130(won 4) @ LAA (lost 4)
Atlanta @ San Fran +120 (won 4)

Minnesota 260 to win 200
Philly 145 to win 100
Texas 80 to win 100
Toronto 80 to win 100
Kansas City 100 to win 100
Oakland 154 to win 200
San Fran 84 to win 100

[rutch]

Looks like a very good system...but I just have one question. Streaks are also meant to end so when do you decide to go against a certain streak? Today for example...Boston lost 3 playing against K.C...personally can't see K.C winning and San Fran has won 4 in a row...we all know they are not going 162-0....when would the system go against them? Just curious

[ConstantColorUpor]

thats what makes it tough have to keep your personal opinions out of it and do what the system tells you, cant cherry pick. Stop betting a team when their streak ends

[AzzClown's Colts]

Sounds good. Thanks for posting. Do u have record for 09? 08?

[ConstantColorUpor]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

System YTD: 5-0 +600
Plays for April 10: (all lines from bodog)

Minnesota -130 (won 4) @ CWS (lost 3)
Philly -145 @ Houston (lost 4)
Sea (lost 4) @ Texas +125
Toronto +125 (won 3) @ Baltimore
Boston (lost 3) @ Kansas City +100
Oakland +130(won 4) @ LAA (lost 4)
Atlanta @ San Fran +120 (won 4)

Minnesota 260 to win 200 WIN 200
Philly 145 to win 100 WIN 100
Texas 80 to win 100 LOSE 80
Toronto 80 to win 100 WIN 100
Kansas City 100 to win 100 LOSE 100
Oakland 154 to win 200 LOSE 154
San Fran 84 to win 100 LOSE 84

April 10 Totals: 3-4 -18
Season Totals: 8-4 +582

[FalconFreak]

I road the Orioles all the way to Hell several years ago, other then that i play streaks some as well

[ConstantColorUpor]

2010 YTD:8-4 +582

April 11 Plays:

Detroit 210 to win 100
Minnesota 160 to win 200
Philly 235 to win 100
Toronto 100 to win 100

[secondbase]

good luck - hope they all come thru

[ConstantColorUpor]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

2010 YTD:8-4 +582

April 11 Plays:

Detroit 210 to win 100 WIN 100
Minnesota 160 to win 200 LOSE 160
Philly 235 to win 100 WIN 100
Toronto 100 to win 100 WIN 100

April 11 Totals: 3-1 +140
Season Totals: 11-5 +722

[ConstantColorUpor]

System YTD: 11-5 +722

April 12 Plays:

Toronto +110 90 to win 100
Tampa Bay -150 150 to win 100
Detroit -200 200 to win 100
Texas -115 115 to win 100
Philly -270 270 to win 100
St Louis -220 220 to win 100

Spoke to a friend today, he plays the same system except this year he is playing the RL on all favorites over -175 that factor into the system. I am debating doing this because the big MLs are what really eat into the profits and a couple of these lose early it could be deadly. Will sleep on it and figure it out tomorrow before the first game.

[TheLink]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

System YTD: 11-5 +722


Spoke to a friend today, he plays the same system except this year he is playing the RL on all favorites over -175 that factor into the system. I am debating doing this because the big MLs are what really eat into the profits and a couple of these lose early it could be deadly. Will sleep on it and figure it out tomorrow before the first game.

Have you considered just making the >-175 no plays? I think I would lean either no play or ml. I know it is a small sample size but just yesterday you had the 2 >-175 win by 1. That +140 day now turns to -260.

I would be curious to see the amount of >-175 that haven't won the game that fall into this series. Another thing you could look into is if you are going to play the >-175 ML never play the game for more than one unit even if it qualifies for 2 unit play.

[Zipnut]

Originally Posted by ConstantColorUpor

System YTD: 11-5 +722

April 12 Plays:

Toronto +110 90 to win 100
Tampa Bay -150 150 to win 100
Detroit -200 200 to win 100
Texas -115 115 to win 100
Philly -270 270 to win 100
St Louis -220 220 to win 100

Spoke to a friend today, he plays the same system except this year he is playing the RL on all favorites over -175 that factor into the system. I am debating doing this because the big MLs are what really eat into the profits and a couple of these lose early it could be deadly. Will sleep on it and figure it out tomorrow before the first game.

so,would consider playing run lines on Phills,Cards and Tigers right. Thanks.

[Chris46139]

Nice keep up the good work