2011 MLB Shut-Out Systems-Plays

[ryhenry09]

SYSTEM 1:

Bet Against a team off scoring 0 runs. This is a 6gm Chase. We will OMIT the following teams. (LAD , OAK , C.SOX).. Everyone else is a go. I like this system the best due to the fact it has only had 3 losses in 3 yrs and we only omit 3 teams.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SYSTEM 2:

Bet On a team off allowing 0 runs. This is a 5gm Chase. We will OMIT the following teams. (LAD , BALT, KC, CLEV, WASH).. Everyone else is a go. As you can ses, the teams we are omitting are mostly lower tier teams.. There are not many wins generated from these teams and alot of risk for a loss.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[ryhenry09]

Sys #1 - 0 - 0 +0 UNITS

Sys #2 - 0 - 0 +0 UNITS

4/2/11- Atl -155.............1.55/1 (sys #1)
4/2/11- Atl -155.............1.55/1 (sys #2)

[home dogs]

RY are these going to be the two systems you stick with all year?

[SI5]

will tail these systems... hopefully less risk

[ZoomVT]

lets get them ryhenry.

If you didnt see them, the spreadsheets are up. links in my sig.

[ryhenry09]

Originally Posted by home dogs

RY are these going to be the two systems you stick with all year?

Yes sir, just playing these 2

[ryhenry09]

Originally Posted by ZoomVT

lets get them ryhenry.

If you didnt see them, the spreadsheets are up. links in my sig.

sweet,looks good

[bigsportsguy2006]

looks good ry

[ryhenry09]

Sys #1 - 0 - 1 -1.55 UNITS

Sys #2 - 0 - 1 -1.55 UNITS

4/3/11- Atl -150.............3.83/2.55 (sys #1)
4/3/11- Atl -150.............3.83/2.55 (sys #2)
4/3/11- SF +120............ .83/1 (sys #2)

[jonnyblaze]

Question: Why omit teams before the season even starts? We dont even know their patterns yet

[duckster]

ya, eliminate Cleve and those other teams are 7-3 to start season, & Balt looks good and KC & LAD not bad. HOU long season, jmo.

[ryhenry09]

Originally Posted by jonnyblaze

Question: Why omit teams before the season even starts? We dont even know their patterns yet

Because each of the last 3 yrs they have shown a loss.. consistant losing patterns. Not worth the risk. The teams I have omitted have never shown a profit in these systems

[nrgaurite]

Originally Posted by ryhenry09

Because each of the last 3 yrs they have shown a loss.. consistant losing patterns. Not worth the risk. The teams I have omitted have never shown a profit in these systems

You have the dodgers listed in both systems. So you're saying they neither win or lose enough to make a profit? If the teams you listed don't win enough shouldn't you at least bet against the dodgers in system #1?

[ryhenry09]

Originally Posted by nrgaurite

You have the dodgers listed in both systems. So you're saying they neither win or lose enough to make a profit? If the teams you listed don't win enough shouldn't you at least bet against the dodgers in system #1?

No, In the last 3 yrs, LAD have performed poorly off scoring and allowing 0. So in regards to sys 1, after Lad score 0, you are betting against, they have won 6 consecutive gms. This is not good. That is why we omit.

[nrgaurite]

Originally Posted by ryhenry09

No, In the last 3 yrs, LAD have performed poorly off scoring and allowing 0. So in regards to sys 1, after Lad score 0, you are betting against, they have won 6 consecutive gms. This is not good. That is why we omit.

sorry but still trying to understand the systems. so in system #1 we should bet against the dodgers right? yet you say they have won 6 consecutive gms after they score 0, therefore it is not good to bet against them. if this is true why even bet against them in system #2 if they usually win? why not wait til the next game?