|
|||||||
| College Football CFB Handicapping - Post your CFB picks, talk CFB betting, anything CFB. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
2010 NCAA Conference Division Odds - Pac 10 Conference
2010 NCAA Conference Division Odds - Pac 10 Conference
odds from thegreek 3611 Arizona +500 3612 Arizona State +1500 3613 California +1000 3614 Oregon +250 3615 Oregon State +500 3616 Stanford +1000 3617 UCLA +800 3618 Southern Cal +175 3619 Washington +650 3620 Washington State +10000 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow. Now that is some crazy stuff. I can understand Southern Cal and Oregon, but the rest really gets strange. UCLA at +800 and both Cal and Stanford at +1000? I don't think so.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I thought Oregon at +250 was pretty high given the offseason suspensions. Arizona and Stanford both seem like they would be worth a shot.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
washington
__________________
"Nobody goes there anymore, its too crowded." --Yogi Berra "Always tell the truth, that way you won't have to remember what you said." --Mark Twain *=$50,000 |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
very wide open, of the longer odds like UCLA
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oregon +250 seems good but they do have to play USC, Cal, and Tenn on the road.
Masoli being dropped only helps this offense...trust me. Thomas should start, but even if it is Costa...its an improvement. Back to Back Pac10 Champs...at least before Texas gets in the mix. The burnt orange coming up to Autzen...I can't wait.
__________________
War Seagull...QUACK QUACK!!! |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
at first glance its all about Oregon here, but Stanford looks like a nice long shot with Luck returning and another year under Harbough, who i think is an excellent coach.
just a first glance
__________________
one thing ive learned is, never let anyone hooskow ya! -the great chili dog 2006 NBA Playoff Contest Champion |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Washington
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Do not sell Oregon State short. They came within one game of winning the Pac 10 in the past two seasons, and they get USC, Cal, and Oregon at home. They hve the Rodgers Brothers returning. Get ready to start looking up tie-breaker rules for the Pac 10.
__________________
"Now I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." George Patton. I am a winner because I make the other poor dumb bastards lose. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Arizona
__________________
NFL - 68-39 (+47.4) 70% ![]() NFL Playoffs - 6-4 (+2.7) ![]() NCAAB -108-104 (+20) ![]() 2011 Canadian Capper and Poster of the Year
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I like Oregon St and didnt even realize the schedule breaks they have at first glance....
__________________
one thing ive learned is, never let anyone hooskow ya! -the great chili dog 2006 NBA Playoff Contest Champion |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
so cal out now.... UCLA suprisingly down to +350 for the conference.... lot of value to be had in this conference if you can get it right
__________________
one thing ive learned is, never let anyone hooskow ya! -the great chili dog 2006 NBA Playoff Contest Champion |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
And that is a huge "if". Here is what I do not understand. Uclelss is down to +350 to win the Pac 9. That is lower than any other Pac 9 team except the two Oregon schools. That very same book (The Greek) has Ucless's total win line at 6, Under -185. That is lower than both Arizona and Cal, who are at 7, over -300 in the case of Arizona, and over -170 in the case of Cal. Other books have Stanford at 7.5 Under -130, Washington at 6 even, and Ucless at 5.5, Under -120. Arizona and Washington are +500 to win the Pac 9 and Cal and Stanford are +800.
So the question seens to be this. Is this just a case of a book trying to rip off it's players, a bunch of stupid players that have no clue, or a combination of ingredients? Anyone taking Ucless at +350 should be seeking help immediately. And people wonder why players lose at an 85% clip.
__________________
"Now I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." George Patton. I am a winner because I make the other poor dumb bastards lose. Last edited by JunkyardDog47; 07-27-2010 at 03:31 PM. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wouldnt bet on UCLA with your money.
I liked Oregon & Oregon St, but they are now both at +250 and i do not see value in that price for this conference right now. The only team im not looking at is Stanford. They have a top QB and the best O-Line in the conference. The schedule is OK for them getting USC, Oregon St, & Arizona at home, while traveling to Oregon, Washington, Cal. To me at 8-1 they are the only team worth a shot to me.
__________________
one thing ive learned is, never let anyone hooskow ya! -the great chili dog 2006 NBA Playoff Contest Champion |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
told you ucla was the bet at +800, now at what +350
I dont think anyone finds value in futures like myself
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.












Linear Mode
