Go Back   Sports Handicapping Forum > Sports Picks > College Basketball

College Basketball CBB Handicapping - Post your CBB picks, talk CBB betting, anything CBB.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2009, 09:41 AM
The Future of the NBA
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 27,426
Rewards: 7,547
21 Bracket Busting Trends

For those who do not have ESPN Insider

Some interesting info


21 BRACKET-BUSTIN' TRENDS




(1) In 11 of the past 12 years, at least one team seeded seventh or worse has reached the Elite Eight. And in the 24 years of the 64/65-team field, at least one team seeded sixth or worse has reached the Elite Eight in 20 of those years.


(2) In the past three years, exactly half of the 12 second-round games between the 8/9 winner and the No. 1 seed have been decided by seven points or fewer (or in OT). In the past 20 tournaments (80 games), the 8/9 winner has either beaten the No. 1 seed or lost by seven points or fewer (or in OT) 36 times. So, expect some close games in the second round.
(3) 10 of the last 11 national champions won their 1st and 2nd round game by double figures (Florida in 2007 won their 2nd round game by 7)
(4) No eventual champion has ever faced the highest possible seed in each round (including the national championship game).
(5) Since seeding began in 1979, only twice has there been a Final Four without a No. 1 seed (1980, 2006).
(6) Last year marked the first time that all four No. 1 seeds reached the Final Four. Prior to 2008, the highest number of No. 1 seeds to get that far in a tournament was three, which occurred three times (1993, 1997, 1999).
(7) Only four times since 1985 have the top four seeds in each region survived the first round (1994, 2000, 2004, 2007).
(8) Only four times since seeding began in 1979 have all four No. 2 seeds reached the Sweet 16 (1982, 1989, 1995, 1996).
(9) A No. 5 seed has never won the national championship.
(10) A No. 7 seed has never reached the championship game, and the only one to reach the Final Four was Virginia in 1984.
(11) The lowest seed to win the national title was No. 8 Villanova in 1985.
(12) The lowest seed to reach the Final Four is a No. 11 (LSU in 1986 and George Mason in 2006). In fact, they are the only seeds lower than eighth to do so.
(13) A No. 12 seed has won at least one game in 18 of the past 20 years (no wins in 2000, 2007), and at least two games in 8 of the past 10 years.
(14) A No. 13 seed has won at least one game in 8 of the last 11 years (no wins in 2000, 2004, 2007).
(15) Although Belmont came close to knocking off Duke last year, No. 15 seeds have gone winless in the past seven years (0-28). That's the longest drought for No. 15s since the field expanded to 64 teams in 1985. The only 15-seed to win in the past 11 tournaments is Hampton in 2001, when they took out Iowa State in Boise.
(16) No. 1 seeds have met in the championship game three of the past four years, which may not sound all the interesting. But when you consider that it happened just three times in the first 26 years of seeding (1982, 1993, 1999), you realize just how rare it's been until recently.
(17) Don't count on a No. 16 upset over a No. 1. It has never happened before (0-96), and games haven't been close at all the past couple years, either. All eight games have been decided by at least 21 points, with an average margin of victory of 31.6 for the top seeds.
(18) For the most part, chalk usually wins out. Since seeding began in 1979, 22 of the 30 national champions have been No. 1 or No. 2 seeds. The last national champ to be seeded worse than third was Arizona in 1997.
(19) Since 1985, in only three years have No. 12 seeds failed to win a game (1988, 2000, 2007). While 12-seeds have actually reached the regional semifinals more than 8th and 9th seeds combined by a comfortable margin (16 to 12) since 1985, they usually flame out. Of those 16 No. 12 seeds, only Missouri in 2002 has gone any further.

(20) Most Consecutive First-Round Wins (Active Streaks):
  • Purdue -- 10
  • Maryland -- 8
  • Auburn -- 7
  • North Carolina -- 7
  • Tulsa -- 5



(21) Most NCAA Tournament Appearances Without Reaching the Final Four, All-Time:
  • BYU -- 23
  • Missouri -- 21
  • Alabama -- 19
  • Xavier -- 19
  • Utah State -- 17
  • Boston College -- 17
  • Miami (OH) -- 17
  • Creighton -- 16
    *Does not include 2009 Appearances
__________________
Up to date records

NFL
51-59 (-14.63 Units)

MLB
141-118 (+13.17 Units)

NHL
319-237 ( +70.15 Units)

NBA
216-200 ( +9.65 Units)

WNBA
4-2 (+1,80 Units)

NCAA CBB
326-280 (+18.52 Units)

GOLF MATCHUPS
19-16 (+2.80 Units)


2009 CappersMall Hall of Fame Inductee

2008 NFL Pick 5 Contest Winner

2010 NFL Pick 5 Contest Runner Up
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2009, 09:54 AM
Still an f'n cheater
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 10,246
Rewards: 964
Thanks for the info
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7yfISlGLNU


Harry: I expected the Rocky Mountains to be a little rockier than this.

Lloyd: I was thinking the same thing. That John Denver's full of shit, man.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2009, 09:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston,Texas
Posts: 12,428
Rewards: 115
Thanks Gerk
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2009, 10:01 AM
Your 2012 NBA champs
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 59,296
Rewards: 1,301
Good stuff Gerk
__________________
Jack
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2009, 01:06 PM
Asian girls are fantastic
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,821
Rewards: 1,805
Great info! Thanks for posting!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-18-2009, 03:10 PM
BooYah!!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,001
Rewards: 2,327
Never in the history of the tourney has a team that DID NOT make it to their Semi-Final game in their Conference ever win a Nat Champ. Interesting stat, cause if that holds true, it knocks our Pitt, UConn, Kansas, OU, maybe 1 or 2 others.

Since the BCS inception with the Big 6 conferences, how many teams outside of those 6 Conferences have won a NC? 0 That doesn't help Memphis.
__________________
2012 MLB 65 - 48 - 15 -.0.24
2012 NCAA Baseball 10 - 7 +0.56
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-18-2009, 04:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,125
Rewards: 147
stats are for losers. they can be manipulated and cherry picked to the core. I'm not saying what he posted from ESPN isn't legit, but those numbers really don't mean anything.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.