Go Back   Sports Handicapping at cappersmall > >

College Basketball CBB Handicapping - Post your CBB picks, talk CBB betting, anything CBB.

Likes Likes:  4
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2019, 06:31 PM
vikesfan vikesfan is offline
CM HOF 2011
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 223,052
Rewards: 573,394
Post Thanks / Like
Likes (Given): 1820
Likes (Received): 13714
5 Biggest snubs according to yahoo sports

1. TCU (20-13, 7-11, NET 52, KenPom 48)
Q1 record: 3-9
Q2 record: 6-4
Best wins: Iowa State (2), Florida, Baylor, Texas (2)
Q3, Q4 losses: 0
TCU would have been a poster child for power-conference mediocrity had it landed one of the final at-large bids. The Horned Frogs had numerous opportunities to notch meaningful victories and capitalized just enough times to remain NCAA tournament relevant. They swept two games from Iowa State, won single games against Baylor and Florida and avoided damaging losses, but overall they went 7-11 in the Big 12 and 3-9 in Quadrant 1 games. Ultimately, not holding a second-half lead against Dean Wade-less Kansas State in the Big 12 quarterfinals might have doomed TCU to the NIT. The Horned Frogs badly needed a conference tournament run to solidify their shaky resume.

2. NC STATE (22-11, 9-9, NET 33, KenPom: 32)
Q1 record: 3-9
Q2 record: 5-0
Best wins: Auburn, Syracuse, Clemson (2)
Q3, Q4 losses: 2 (Georgia Tech, at Wake Forest)
To say that North Carolina State scheduled poorly this season is a gross understatement. The Wolfpack's non-conference schedule was dead last out of 353 Division I teams, a product of a remarkable eight games against teams 275th or worse in the NET rankings. Given the committee's longtime emphasis on teams challenging themselves out of conference, NC State left itself vulnerable to being snubbed unless it did something special in the rest of its games. That didn't happen. The Wolfpack went a pedestrian 9-9 in the ACC and beat only two projected NCAA tournament teams — Auburn and Syracuse. The omission of NC State is evidence the committee did not just blindly follow the NET rankings, the new metric that replaced the RPI as the primary tool for gauging the strength of teams. The Wolfpack's No. 33 NET ranking suggested they were good enough to make the field, but close inspection of their resume indicated otherwise.

3. INDIANA (17-15, 8-12, NET 54, KenPom 42)
Q1 record: 6-9
Q2 record: 2-6
Best wins: Michigan State (2), Wisconsin, Louisville Marquette
Q3, Q4 losses: 0
For a team that was only 17-15 overall, Indiana had a decent argument to make the NCAA tournament. The Hoosiers boasted the most Quadrant 1 wins of any bubble team including a season sweep of Big Ten champion Michigan State and three other victories over opponents projected to be seeded seventh or better in the NCAA tournament. Archie Miller’s second season in Bloomington was a year of wild swings as Indiana leaped out of the starting blocks 12-2, then endured a rash of injuries and dropped 12 of its next 13. They nearly salvaged their season with a late winning streak before a crushing loss to Ohio State in the opening round of the Big Ten tournament. Ultimately, the committee decided Indiana’s uneven overall body of work wasn’t good enough even though there was precedent for teams similar to the Hoosiers being selected. Alabama snagged an at-large bid last March with 15 losses, as did Vanderbilt the previous season. Villanova and Georgia also both received at-large bids at 16-14 in 1991 and 2001, respectively.

4. UNC GREENSBORO (28-6, 15-3 NET 60, KenPom 81)
Q1 record: 2-6
Q2 record: 2-0
Best wins: Furman (2), East Tennessee State (2)
Q3, Q4 losses: 0
Some bubble teams on this list had more than a dozen chances against power-conference foes bound for the NCAA tournament. UNC Greensboro, on the other hand, only had two, both on the road against top 10 opponents. The Spartans lost by six to LSU in Baton Rouge and pushed Kentucky for 35 minutes in Lexington. UNC Greensboro’s margin for error for an at-large bid was miniscule after those losses, and the Spartans couldn’t quite do enough to thread that needle. In a top-heavy Southern Conference featuring four of the nation’s best mid-majors, UNC Greensboro went 4-1 against Furman and East Tennessee State but lost to eventual league champ Wofford all three times they played. Only one of their six losses came against a team outside the NET top 15, but they also lacked noteworthy wins.

5. TEXAS (16-16, 8-10, NET 38, KenPom 30)
Q1 record: 5-10
Q2 record: 4-5
Best wins: North Carolina, Purdue, at Kansas State, Kansas, Iowa State
Q3, Q4 losses: 1 (Radford)
Never before had a team earned an at-large bid with a .500 record or 16 losses, but Texas had reason to maintain hope of being the first. A ridiculous 19 of Texas’ 32 games came against opponents in the NET top 50 this season and the Longhorns won seven of those, notching victories over North Carolina, Purdue, Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State, Baylor and Oklahoma. They were also top 40 in the NET and top 30 in KenPom, which compared favorably to other bubble teams. It was always a long shot that Texas would make the NCAA tournament because of the precedent it would set, but the committee had incentive to give the Longhorns a hard look. Including them would have sent the message that the committee rewards a tough non-conference schedule, something that is good for the health of the sport.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2019, 07:52 PM
Pic N Winnas Pic N Winnas is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,090
Rewards: 2,717
Post Thanks / Like
Likes (Given): 5
Likes (Received): 150
They have shown they don't reward a hard non conference schedule though.Year after year they give Duke a hall pass to the final 4.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2019, 12:39 PM
Hoosiercatdaddy Hoosiercatdaddy is offline
It all started with him
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Indianapolis, TX
Posts: 38,836
Rewards: 23,658
Post Thanks / Like
Likes (Given): 301
Likes (Received): 1104
I can't get over how many people think Indiana was a snub. I'm not sure how they swept Mich St, but other than those 2 wins, they were absolutely awful for over 2 months. That's my team and I'm the first to admit they do not belong.
Likes WildKat, xxxFTWxxx, tigerbait liked this post
R.I.P Rambler Buddy (7/20/1947- 4/20/2006)
Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2019, 12:52 AM
dsypula dsypula is offline
Dave in Tally
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tallahassee
Posts: 544
Rewards: 4,926
Post Thanks / Like
Likes (Given): 1836
Likes (Received): 343
I agree with you Cat......

Also, I felt Ohio State was equally awful. They didn't belong either, imo.
Likes WildKat liked this post
Best of Luck Boys
Reply With Quote

losses, net, record, state, teams

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00% Host: cappersmallweb5