Go Back   Sports Handicapping Forum > Sports Picks > College Basketball
Attn: NCAA Tournament Committee Attn: NCAA Tournament Committee
Register Rewards Mark Forums Read

College Basketball CBB Handicapping - Post your CBB picks, talk CBB betting, anything CBB.

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By PHILLYBIRDS20

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:46 PM
Purdue Final Four
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boilermaker Country
Posts: 10,604
Rewards: 398
Attn: NCAA Tournament Committee
Colorado and Virginia Tech thank you for the opportunity to watch UAB attempt to play basketball this evening......it was more or less a UAB clinic on how to turn the ball over and play like a JV team.

Letting UAB in sure looks good now doesn't it.....
__________________
2011-'12 CollegeBB: 228 - 232 - 8, +6.92 units
2011-'12 CollegeBB 5*** plays: 21 - 10 - 0
2011-'12 NFL: 79 - 77 - 2, +3.62 units
2011-'12 NCAAF: 57 - 49 - 0, +4.34 units
2009 NFL Best Handicapper Contest Runner Up
Last updated:3/17/12 @ 10:58 pm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:48 PM
Registered User
  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 929
Rewards: 50
IT pathetic for those seniors that never got in the tourney. I understand that they had 4 years to accomplish that, but this was a total screw job. I understand VCU to a certain extent but no way, no how UAB belonged.


Also St Mary's got screwed as well. If you put their resume beside UAB.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:48 PM
whats yo orda fool
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PHILLY
Posts: 29,921
Rewards: 3,299
maybe if va tech didnt schedule the likes of south carolina upstate they would have a shot, but UAB is putrid would have rather seen ST Marys than tech. COLO got jobbed but there non conference is brutal also.
Last edited by PHILLYBIRDS20; 03-15-2011 at 10:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:49 PM
Purdue Final Four
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boilermaker Country
Posts: 10,604
Rewards: 398
VT's only solid non conf. game was Purdue at home....lost in OT in a very sloppy game.

Both still more deserving than UAB
__________________
2011-'12 CollegeBB: 228 - 232 - 8, +6.92 units
2011-'12 CollegeBB 5*** plays: 21 - 10 - 0
2011-'12 NFL: 79 - 77 - 2, +3.62 units
2011-'12 NCAAF: 57 - 49 - 0, +4.34 units
2009 NFL Best Handicapper Contest Runner Up
Last updated:3/17/12 @ 10:58 pm
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:53 PM
whats yo orda fool
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PHILLY
Posts: 29,921
Rewards: 3,299
we could 5 on cm more deserving than UAB I have never seen that many airballs on 3s in my life
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:53 PM
Registered User
  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,649
Rewards: 160
Lol uab. Yes if I'm Colorado watching at home I'm sick. This is the all ostricized coach league ....mike Davis, Tim Floyd, Larry eustachy.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:54 PM
Registered User
  
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 929
Rewards: 50
Actually Vtech played Purdue, UNLV, Penn State, Kansas State(4 Tourney Teams)

Also scheduled Oklahoma St and Miss St(who was supposed to be good, but who knew rick stansbury cant keep his team in check)


Actually think colorado deserved it more than UAB, then Vtech. St Mary's as well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:56 PM
Purdue Final Four
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boilermaker Country
Posts: 10,604
Rewards: 398
Committee will be answering more ?'s tomorrow thanks to UAB's performance tonight.
__________________
2011-'12 CollegeBB: 228 - 232 - 8, +6.92 units
2011-'12 CollegeBB 5*** plays: 21 - 10 - 0
2011-'12 NFL: 79 - 77 - 2, +3.62 units
2011-'12 NCAAF: 57 - 49 - 0, +4.34 units
2009 NFL Best Handicapper Contest Runner Up
Last updated:3/17/12 @ 10:58 pm
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-15-2011, 10:58 PM
whats yo orda fool
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PHILLY
Posts: 29,921
Rewards: 3,299
there answer to the questions is let more teams in and make there job easier. There will be 96 teams before u know it
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-15-2011, 11:01 PM
Purdue Final Four
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boilermaker Country
Posts: 10,604
Rewards: 398
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHILLYBIRDS20 View Post
there answer to the questions is let more teams in and make there job easier. There will be 96 teams before u know it
regardless of the field size there will always be "bubble" teams.....leave it at 64, just do a better job of not making the obvious mistake. Colorado's omission from the tournament was 2011's obvious mistake after tonight. In years past they haven't made the drastic seeding errors as they obviously made this year.

Leave the damn tournament at 64, that's what makes it so special IMO
__________________
2011-'12 CollegeBB: 228 - 232 - 8, +6.92 units
2011-'12 CollegeBB 5*** plays: 21 - 10 - 0
2011-'12 NFL: 79 - 77 - 2, +3.62 units
2011-'12 NCAAF: 57 - 49 - 0, +4.34 units
2009 NFL Best Handicapper Contest Runner Up
Last updated:3/17/12 @ 10:58 pm
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.