|
|||||||
| NFL Football NFL Handicapping - Post your NFL picks, talk NFL betting, anything NFL. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Favorites are 5-3 ATS, so Dogs are obv 3-5 ATS
of the 3 dogs that covered the spread they were also SU winners dog is bound to cover yet not win who will it be ?
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
jets imo lose 17-13
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
__________________
one thing ive learned is, never let anyone hooskow ya! -the great chili dog 2006 NBA Playoff Contest Champion |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well since I like the Colts to win by double digits I guess that only leaves me with the Vikes but to be completely honest I don't think the points will matter in this game either. Either the Saints win and cover or the Vikes win outright. So I guess my answer would be neither of them.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
jets cover the 6 vs the saints lose 21-23
__________________
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
SU Winner in the conf champ gms are 21-0-1 ATS L11 yrs....
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
means nothing to me, I realize its a trend, and im not one to buck a trend
the dumbest gambling bs is to fade a trend, its much better to ride one however there has to be more to it... do you think that a team makes it this far, yet falls behind in the game and loses will and emotion? whats behind that trend?
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think true trends are always valid in some amount, negative or positive you still have to cap the game / situation / and trend to be consistent using that as a tool , back to square 1 type thing but every thing has to be considered valid to go into your descision in final with or against imo if true.
__________________
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
the best betting angle i have seen just from experience and without going back to check is simply throughout the playoffs to bet alternate lines on both teams...i.e. take the favorite for more than the spread and take the dog as a - fav...get both sides at large + money and wait for the cash to tumble in. I know from memory it won last year, I think the year before, and so far in the last two weeks I think you would be 8-0...(in a case like the jets +300 ml i think pays plenty, or in this week's jets again if this were employed)
think about it romo you are smarter than the average bear-fan, i think this has some cred and you have the database to go back and check it out should you so choose |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bold prediction, but I like it.
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Since 1970, in Conference Championship games where the point spread is less than 10 points, the winning team is a perfect 65-0-2 against the spread.
Found this on a different site. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
NFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS
2008 ARIZONA (+3 1/2) 30 - Philadelphia 25 2007 N. Y. Giants (+7 1/2) 23 - GR. BAY 20 (OT) 2006 CHICAGO (-2 1/2) 39 - New Orleans 14 2005 SEATTLE (-3 1/2) 34 - Carolina 14 2004 PHILADELPHIA (-5 1/2) 27 - Atlanta 10 2003 Carolina (+4) 14 - PHILADELPHIA 3 2002 Tampa Bay (+4) 27 - PHILADELPHIA 10 2001 ST. LOUIS (-10 1/2) 29 - Philadelphia 24 2000 N.Y. GIANTS (+ 21/2) 41 - Minnesota 0 1999 ST. LOUIS (-14) 11 - Tampa Bay 6 1998 Atlanta (+11) 30 - MINNESOTA 27 (OT) 1997 Green Bay (-2 1/2) 23 - SAN FRANCISCO 10 1996 GREEN BAY (-12 1/2) 30 - Carolina 13 1995 DALLAS (-8 1/2) 38 - Green Bay 27 1994 SAN FRANCISCO (-7 1/2) 38 - Dallas 28 1993 DALLAS (-3 1/2) 38 - San Francisco 21 1992 Dallas (+4) 30 - SAN FRANCISCO 20 1991 WASHINGTON (-13 1/2) 41 - Detroit 10 1990 N.Y. Giants (+8) 15 - SAN FRANCISCO 13 1989 SAN FRANCISCO (-7) 30 - L.A. Rams 3 1988 San Francisco (pick) 28 - CHICAGO 3 1987 WASHINGTON (-3 1/2) 17 - Minnesota 10 1986 N.Y. GIANTS (-7 1/2) 17 - Washington 0 1985 CHICAGO (-10 1/2) 24 - L.A. Rams 0 1984 SAN FRANCISCO (-9) 23 - Chicago 0 1983 WASHINGTON (-10 1/2) 24 - San Francisco 21 1982 WASHINGTON (+2) 31 - Dallas 17 1981 SAN FRANCISCO (+3) 28 - Dallas 27 1980 PHILADELPHIA (+1) 20 - Dallas 7 1979 Los Angeles (-3 1/2) 9 - TAMPA BAY 0 1978 Dallas (-3 1/2) 28 - LOS ANGELES 0 1977 DALLAS (-11 1/2) 23 - Minnesota 6 1976 MINNESOTA (-4 1/2) 24 - Los Angeles 13 1975 Dallas (+6) 37 - LOS ANGELES 7 1974 MINNESOTA (-4) 14 - Los Angeles 10 1973 Minnesota (+1) 27 - DALLAS 10 1972 WASHINGTON (-3) 26 - Dallas 3 1971 DALLAS (-7 1/2) 14 - San Francisco 3 1970 Dallas (+4) 17 - SAN FRANCISCO 10 AFC CHAMPIONSHIP RESULTS 2008 PITTSBURGH (-6) 23 - Baltimore 14 2007 NEW ENGLAND (-13 1/2) 21 - San Diego 12 2006 INDIANAPOLIS (-3) 38 - New England 34 2005 Pittsburgh (+3) 34 - DENVER 17 2004 New England (+3) 41 - PITTSBURGH 27 2003 NEW ENGLAND (-3) 24 - Indianapolis 14 2002 OAKLAND (-8) 41 - Tennessee 24 2001 New England (+10) 24 - PITTSBURGH 17 2000 Baltimore (+6) 16 - OAKLAND 3 1999 Tennessee (+7) 33 - JACKSONVILLE 14 1998 DENVER (-9) 23 - N.Y. Jets 10 1997 Denver (-2 1/2) 24 - PITTSBURGH 21 1996 NEW ENGLAND (-7) 20 - Jacksonville 6 1995 PITTSBURGH (-11 1/2) 20 - Indianapolis 16 1994 San Diego (+9) 17 - PITTSBURGH 13 1993 BUFFALO (-3) 30 - Kansas City 13 1992 Buffalo (-2 1/2) 29 - MIAMI 10 1991 BUFFALO (-11 1/2) 10 - Denver 7 1990 BUFFALO (-7) 51 - L.A. Raiders 3 1989 DENVER (-3 1/2) 37 - Cleveland 21 1988 CINCINNATI (-4 1/2) 21 - Buffalo 10 1987 DENVER (-3) 38 - Cleveland 33 1986 Denver (+3) 23 - CLEVELAND 20 (OT) 1985 New England (+5 1/2) 31 - MIAMI 14 1984 MIAMI (-9 1/2) 45 - Pittsburgh 28 1983 L.A. RAIDERS (-7 1/2) 30 - Seattle 14 1982 MIAMI (-2) 14 - N.Y. Jets 0 1981 CINCINNATI (-4 1/2) 27 - San Diego 7 1980 Oakland (+4) 34 - SAN DIEGO 27 1979 PITTSBURGH (-9 1/2) 27 - Houston 13 1978 PITTSBURGH (-7) 34 - Houston 5 1977 DENVER (+31/2) 20 - Oakland 17 1976 OAKLAND (+4 1/2) 24 - Pittsburgh 7 1975 PITTSBURGH (-6) 16 - Oakland 10 1974 Pittsburgh (+5 1/2) 24 - OAKLAND 13 1973 MIAMI (-6 1/2) 27 - Oakland 10 1972 Miami (-2 1/2) 21 - PITTSBURGH 17 1971 MIAMI (-1 1/2) 21 - Baltimore 0 1970 BALTIMORE (+1) 27 - Oakland 17 |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
thats pretty incredible, good stuff
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
damn that's amazing. so if you got a pretty good hunch on a dog covering, would be smart to throw extra on them winning SU too
__________________
"No matter how bad it may get, just keep going, because you only fail when you give up." 2010-11 NBA 4-7-0 (-8.3 units) 2010 NBA Playoffs 8-4-1 (+8.1 units) |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yea. All you really had to do was pick a winner this playoff season. The line hasn't come into play in any of these games so far. And to take that one step further 6 out of 8 games with the exception of the Jets win on Sunday and the Cards win the previous week over Green Bay has been decided by 10 or more points.
Does the point spread come into play for the Championship games on Sunday?? I think i'm going to continue to cap the same way in that if come up liking the Vikes and/or Jets, that I gotta like em to win SU... |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 PM.









Linear Mode

