|
|||||||
| NFL Football NFL Handicapping - Post your NFL picks, talk NFL betting, anything NFL. |
| View Poll Results: Denver +3 @ Jacksonville - Who ya got ? | |||
| Denver +3 |
|
12 | 46.15% |
| Jacksonville -3 |
|
14 | 53.85% |
| Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Denver +3 @ Jacksonville - Who ya got ?
Denver +3 @ Jacksonville - Who ya got ?
Any thoughts ?
__________________
2005-present ATS NFL - 158 - 121 - 15 - 57% CFB - 259 - 161 - 11 - 62% CBB - 354 - 189 - 20 - 65% 12/20/2010 ML's > -150 - 3-0 GOY's 13-1 -Go with your gut, not the chatter
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am leaning to Jacksonville in this game, but to be honest, don't have a real strong feeling one way or another. I don't like Orton, and can't trust him either, but don't have much faith in Garrard either.
__________________
"A Pat On The Back Is Only 8" Away From A Kick In The Ass" |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I feel denver will win. Orton has one of the highest completion percentages of the preseason and will manage the game. Jacksonville limited on offense 3 core players and a shaky line. Plus tebow is second string for this game so it will be like a home game in Florida for the broncos.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like Jack...........
wouldnt underestimate the heat and humidity factor....... Temperature: 88°F Feels like: 97°F Sunset: 7:36 PM Probability of precip: 20% Spectator Index: 6 UV Index: Very High Wind Impact: LIGHT WSW at 5.0 mph
__________________
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- Jack Lambert -- |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- Jack Lambert -- |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
10min mark
__________________
2005-present ATS NFL - 158 - 121 - 15 - 57% CFB - 259 - 161 - 11 - 62% CBB - 354 - 189 - 20 - 65% 12/20/2010 ML's > -150 - 3-0 GOY's 13-1 -Go with your gut, not the chatter
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
denver
gl
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rome... Know it is late, but did something stick out here for you ? Any reason in specific you liked the jags here.. or is it a line/public type thing ? TIA
__________________
2005-present ATS NFL - 158 - 121 - 15 - 57% CFB - 259 - 161 - 11 - 62% CBB - 354 - 189 - 20 - 65% 12/20/2010 ML's > -150 - 3-0 GOY's 13-1 -Go with your gut, not the chatter
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
say what? I liked denver, not jax, enough to make it a play in the buy in contest
I just like the matchup, jax secondary is terrible, evidence is the drive denver just put together in 3 plays tying the game Denver should be winning, they fumbled in the red zone earlier 7-7 at the half
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Have Miami teased so I am watching that right now, and won't be able to watch this game till later this week... if at all. Just wanted to know what to look for on the other side of things, because I leaned on Jacksonville.
__________________
2005-present ATS NFL - 158 - 121 - 15 - 57% CFB - 259 - 161 - 11 - 62% CBB - 354 - 189 - 20 - 65% 12/20/2010 ML's > -150 - 3-0 GOY's 13-1 -Go with your gut, not the chatter
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
lot of people I respect were on Jax, I just liked Denver...
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.








Linear Mode

