Go Back   Sports Handicapping Forum > Sports Picks > NFL Football

NFL Football NFL Handicapping - Post your NFL picks, talk NFL betting, anything NFL.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:32 AM
The Future of the NBA
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 27,431
Rewards: 7,560
Green Bay -10 over Chicago

Opening line

Bears have nothing to play for, Green Bay has everything to play for.

Bears going to rest starters and how many?

What we think?
__________________
Up to date records

NFL
51-59 (-14.63 Units)

MLB
146-120 (+15.74 Units)

NHL
319-237 ( +70.15 Units)

NBA
216-202 ( +7.45 Units)

WNBA
4-2 (+1,80 Units)

NCAA CBB
326-280 (+18.52 Units)

GOLF MATCHUPS
19-16 (+2.80 Units)


2009 CappersMall Hall of Fame Inductee

2008 NFL Pick 5 Contest Winner

2010 NFL Pick 5 Contest Runner Up
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:33 AM
Nectar of the Gods
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 17,364
Rewards: 2,755
I think the Bears take a rest in the 2nd half. But more important, should I pick up Kuhn off waivers in my Championship game?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,381
Rewards: 714
Packers blow them out!
__________________
ALL UNITS ARE 50 DOLLARS BECAUSE THAT IS ALL I CAN AFFORD

START OF 10-18-11

NHL - 7-5

NCAA football 5-1

NFL 1-1
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:36 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 40,638
Rewards: 0
packers win by 2 tds whether or not the starters play. they are just a much better team
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:37 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,827
Rewards: 835
I'm gonna take bears +10, I don't see a blowout game
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2010, 11:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,381
Rewards: 714
The falcons Are not gonna lose to' The panthers! The bears will play there starters for a half and martz will keep it super conservative!
__________________
ALL UNITS ARE 50 DOLLARS BECAUSE THAT IS ALL I CAN AFFORD

START OF 10-18-11

NHL - 7-5

NCAA football 5-1

NFL 1-1
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,789
Rewards: 555
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjb1816 View Post
packers win by 2 tds whether or not the starters play. they are just a much better team
You are officially a retard, RJB.....I sit here and watch you do this over and over and finally I will take the bait.

Now, I think the Packers will win (home field and motivation to play), but to say they are just a much better team is non-sense and any person with common sense could tell you that....The Bears have a better record and also beat them heads up.....Ummmmm--kinda hard to argue those two key points.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 8,744
Rewards: 4,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunder View Post
You are officially a retard, RJB.....I sit here and watch you do this over and over and finally I will take the bait.

Now, I think the Packers will win (home field and motivation to play), but to say they are just a much better team is non-sense and any person with common sense could tell you that....The Bears have a better record and also beat them heads up.....Ummmmm--kinda hard to argue those two key points.
Member since 2004 and finally took the bait? Congrats..I couldn't and didn't wait that long

wecome to the club
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:25 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 40,638
Rewards: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thunder View Post
You are officially a retard, RJB.....I sit here and watch you do this over and over and finally I will take the bait.

Now, I think the Packers will win (home field and motivation to play), but to say they are just a much better team is non-sense and any person with common sense could tell you that....The Bears have a better record and also beat them heads up.....Ummmmm--kinda hard to argue those two key points.
you want to compare the injuries of the two teams? lmao

you really want to rehash that game in chicago like 2 months ago? And how lucky the bears have gotten? They've faced 3 third string qbs this season, the packers had to start matt flynn on the road against the pats...gimme a break. The only regret I have is not being able to see the packers play the bears in the first round of the playoffs so they could pound the shit out of them again in front of all the bears fans
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,789
Rewards: 555
A much better team based on what? What they COULD be with less injuries? Just stop and think about that for a minute.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:33 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 40,638
Rewards: 0
No a better team based on what they are right now. Lets just take this latest example, they went in to NE lost barely at the end of the game with their backup qb to a team that pounded the bears by 30+ at home with all of their regulars. Just stop and think about that for a minute
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,381
Rewards: 714
Rjb will always be a "what could of been" kind of guy! If The chargers had better special teams they would have not got blown out by The raiders and would be in The playoffs! Dont get mad thats just how he is!
__________________
ALL UNITS ARE 50 DOLLARS BECAUSE THAT IS ALL I CAN AFFORD

START OF 10-18-11

NHL - 7-5

NCAA football 5-1

NFL 1-1
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:37 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 40,638
Rewards: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by hooks26 View Post
Rjb will always be a "what could of been" kind of guy! If The chargers had better special teams they would have not got blown out by The raiders and would be in The playoffs! Dont get mad thats just how he is!
i mean anyone with a brain knows if they had better special teams they would be in the playoffs...that's not even up for discussion. but this is a bears thread
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,827
Rewards: 835
You can't base everything on 1/2 games. It's about the whole season. If you wanted to just pick games and be like so and so lost to so and so that one time, then the patriots lost to the browns... I'm not saying the bears are better than the pats, but the bears are not as horrible as you're making them out to be.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-29-2010, 12:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,789
Rewards: 555
How they are now?? They just got beat by the Lions a few weeks ago. And if you tell me that Rodgers got knocked out in that game, I will remind you that this vaunted offense got shut out in the first half of that game with him still playing. Stop and think about that for a minute.

And don't tell me you're going to try and do the A vs. B vs. C theory....We have seen time and time again that that idea makes little sense most times...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.