Opinions welcome

[Earl]

If a starting quarterback went down, Who would have the back-up QB to keep their season alive or get them to the play offs. We know Jon Kitna aint it. Mark Brunell seems to thing he could do it if Sanchez went down tomorrow

[TheLink]

it depends on that state of the franchise I think. Comparing Kitna taking over 1-5 Cowboys to Brunell taking over 5-2 Jets is big difference.

Personally Qb depth in this league is a major problem which is reason why you have Rex Grossman, TJackson, Brunell, etc as backups.

[ptb9]

Philly,with Kobb and Vick

[Earl]

Originally Posted by ptb9

Philly,with Kobb and Vick

I thought about that, but you don't know who the fuk is starting from one week to the next. I think they have scheduled starters instead of having a starter for their team

[TheLink]

out of the teams that are currently .500 or above only backups I would be sold on would be Vick/Kolb or Rosenfels (but not really sold on him). With Jets and Steelers defense also think their backup qb could manage the game well enough to keep them in it.

[Earl]

Originally Posted by TheLink

it depends on that state of the franchise I think. Comparing Kitna taking over 1-5 Cowboys to Brunell taking over 5-2 Jets is big difference.

Personally Qb depth in this league is a major problem which is reason why you have Rex Grossman, TJackson, Brunell, etc as backups.

yeah but if you come out as a back-up playing with a losing record and end up with a winning season, or even go to the play-offs with that QB. He will probably be your starting choice next year. If the starter starts out 0-2 the next season

[ptb9]

But either way there in good shape,other than them i can't think of any other team that has a better than average back up.