Go Back   Sports Handicapping Forum > Sports Picks > NFL Football

NFL Football NFL Handicapping - Post your NFL picks, talk NFL betting, anything NFL.

View Poll Results: Which QB-WR combination will be more productive this year?
J.Flacco - A.Boldin 13 52.00%
M.Leinart - L.Fitzgerald 12 48.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2010, 07:35 AM
A gun beats 4 aces always
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: the hammer
Posts: 5,572
Rewards: 1,308
Which QB-WR combination will be more productive this year?

just throwing it out there...I take Flacco and Boldin...

Last edited by HAMILROCK; 03-08-2010 at 07:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2010, 10:36 AM
Im your Huckleberry
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Yo Moms House
Posts: 5,766
Rewards: 1,908
Flacco and Boldin
__________________
$10 = 1 Unit

2011/2012
NFL 0-1
CFB 1-0
NHL 17-20

It's going to be a long season
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2010, 10:46 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,713
Rewards: 1,956
gotta like flacco over leinart
__________________
one thing ive learned is, never let anyone hooskow ya! -the great chili dog

2006 NBA Playoff Contest Champion
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2010, 05:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,029
Rewards: 631
I have an inkling sitting on the sideline has been good for Leinart and he wont be as bad as some think. However there is about a 90% chance I am way off on this and hes going to be a bum.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-08-2010, 07:39 PM
The Mayor is back in town
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lawrence, Kansas
Posts: 38,081
Rewards: 2,476
good question, ill take flacco & boldin too, but i think it'll be closer than most think
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-08-2010, 08:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 12,211
Rewards: 1,897
even tho leinhart sucks...i'd still go with fitz over boldin.

ravens are a run heavy offense. i dont see that changing next season. the cards are a pass heavy offense. mostly because of warner but also because they cant run the ball.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-08-2010, 08:30 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 40,638
Rewards: 0
boldin plays in like 8 games a year so i'll take fitz
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-2010, 09:22 PM
The King of Diamonds
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Maryland - Now Chicago
Posts: 12,960
Rewards: 1,151
I thought you guys thought Flacco sucked.

wtf?
__________________
Im 25 thinkin bout retiring...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-09-2010, 01:22 PM
Bring on baseball!
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Barrie, ON
Posts: 6,030
Rewards: 1,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjb1816 View Post
boldin plays in like 8 games a year so i'll take fitz
Totally agree with this. While I believe Flacco is better than Leinart, a great WR can make a QB better. Fitz is better than Boldin, and is healthier. So I'll take that combo for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-11-2010, 01:26 AM
TTB TTB is offline
Thanks for the memories 7
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,167
Rewards: 2,114
Thought McNabb was going to be running the show in Zona? lol
__________________
MLB 2011: 2-3 -$1115
MLB 2010: +$4000
MLB 2008-2009: +$9200


*10-20 Unit Plays all time MLB posted record: 37-20
(65% OF THE TIME IT WORKS EVERYTIME!)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.