Go Back   Sports Handicapping Forum > Sports Picks > NFL Football

NFL Football NFL Handicapping - Post your NFL picks, talk NFL betting, anything NFL.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2010, 11:47 AM
Advisory Board
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Alabama but displaced in NC
Posts: 17,179
Rewards: 740
Who Starts for Pitt

Is it Batch or who?

wde
__________________
We are Cam-ily!War Damn Eagle
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-24-2010, 12:59 PM
Shhhh!!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: 412
Posts: 11,648
Rewards: 1,867
Leftwitch maybe Dixon
__________________
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler."

-- Jack Lambert --
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2010, 01:32 PM
skoal brother
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,503
Rewards: 2,665
slasher...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-24-2010, 06:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 14,393
Rewards: 3,361
Lefty will get the nod.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-25-2010, 09:34 PM
Cappersmall Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Nv
Posts: 14,548
Rewards: 3,829
yeah but how many games does he win for Pitt? 1 maybe 2. Pitts offense supports a mobile quarterback. Lefty is far from Mobile and he take till X-mas to get rid of the ball. Steelers offensive line is going to hate this guy
__________________
20* GOY 0-0-1
10* GOM 1-1
PARLAYS 3-0

NO LONGER DO I POST ON NWB- ACCUSED OF STEALING PLAYS!
2007 NFL PRESEASON CONTEST CHAMPION
2010 MLB LAST MAN STANDING CONTEST CHAMPION
2011 WORLD SERIES CONTEST CHAMPION
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-25-2010, 09:44 PM
political gambler
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh and CA
Posts: 1,020
Rewards: 236
I think a different scheme will start to be utilized in pgh. Last year really showed how the defensive scheme does not match up with a passing offense. The defense got exposed/worn down the longer it was on the field. The steelers inability to run the ball helped contribute to this. No especially with a replacement quarterback at the helm, the steelers should attempt to utilize mendenhall and quite possibly dwyer. Mwelde will still be used primarily as a passing down back but can can the rock in a pinch. So if the steelers truely get back to smash mouth football that might squeek by at 2 and 2 for the first four weeks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-25-2010, 09:54 PM
the straightshooter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: an onrushing tram, on collision course
Posts: 46,830
Rewards: 872
exactly burgh, which is why they drafted pouncey, to run the ball

they needed to change from what was mostly a spread offense regardless if ben was suspended or not
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance

Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2010, 07:13 AM
Shhhh!!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: 412
Posts: 11,648
Rewards: 1,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burgh Brew Crew View Post
I think a different scheme will start to be utilized in pgh. Last year really showed how the defensive scheme does not match up with a passing offense. The defense got exposed/worn down the longer it was on the field. The steelers inability to run the ball helped contribute to this. No especially with a replacement quarterback at the helm, the steelers should attempt to utilize mendenhall and quite possibly dwyer. Mwelde will still be used primarily as a passing down back but can can the rock in a pinch. So if the steelers truely get back to smash mouth football that might squeek by at 2 and 2 for the first four weeks



Yeh, But that will not happen untill BA is gone.


Kind of why we were on that fire BA bandwagon.
__________________
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler."

-- Jack Lambert --

Last edited by Sweetleaf22; 04-26-2010 at 07:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2010, 07:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,152
Rewards: 1,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanowski View Post
exactly burgh, which is why they drafted pouncey, to run the ball

they needed to change from what was mostly a spread offense regardless if ben was suspended or not
Actually IMO they ran enough but just were not very good at it.. Pitt ran it 428 times and threw 536.. Pretty much NFL average.. Dallas with better backs ran it 436 times and threw it 550.. Even a team like the Vikes with a stud at rb ran it only 467 times (2.5 more a game then Pitt) Peterson is worth the 2 extra carries a game.. Pitt fans have to figure it out .. This is the new NFL with rule changes benefiting the passing game.. Add on the fact you have a QB you are paying 100 million (and by the way had 26 tds &12 ints last year) its makes no sense to go back to 3 yards and a cloud of dust .. Look at the last 4 years in the NFL the good teams all put it up.. As for BBC contention the defense was tired.. Please ... They were suspected to the pass due to Troy and Smiths injuries.. Plus the fact that William Gay was one of the worst DB's in the NFL last year if not the worst.. Franco aint coming bacl people get used to the ball in the air.. They did not draft the likes of Wallace and this years 3rd rounder to block.. They fly.. Its a new era for Pitt foorball and the NFL for that matter.. Pouncey was brought in to block on the run but not for more carries just to do it better..IMO
__________________
2005 CAPPERS MALL COLLEGE BOWL CHAMP
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-26-2010, 09:20 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,713
Rewards: 1,956
Dixon should start. Lefty is 2nd string. Batch 3rd
__________________
one thing ive learned is, never let anyone hooskow ya! -the great chili dog

2006 NBA Playoff Contest Champion
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-26-2010, 11:38 AM
Shhhh!!
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: 412
Posts: 11,648
Rewards: 1,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burgh Brew Crew View Post
and quite possibly dwyer. Mwelde will still be used primarily as a passing down back but can can the rock in a pinch. So if the steelers truely get back to smash mouth football that might squeek by at 2 and 2 for the first four weeks

Someone say Barry Foster Trip opt Clone


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bq9Ym...yer_embedded#!
Steel of the draft here.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-g4N...yer_embedded#!
__________________
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler."

-- Jack Lambert --

Last edited by Sweetleaf22; 04-26-2010 at 11:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-26-2010, 05:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 13,633
Rewards: 1,141
leftwich will start 1 game until they realize he is horrible then prob dixon...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-26-2010, 05:20 PM
the straightshooter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: an onrushing tram, on collision course
Posts: 46,830
Rewards: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZIGGYSTARDUST View Post
. Pitt fans have to figure it out .. This is the new NFL with rule changes benefiting the passing game.. Add on the fact you have a QB you are paying 100 million (and by the way had 26 tds &12 ints last year) its makes no sense to go back to 3 yards and a cloud of dust .. Look at the last 4 years in the NFL the good teams all put it up.. Franco aint coming bacl people get used to the ball in the air.. They did not draft the likes of Wallace and this years 3rd rounder to block.. They fly.. Its a new era for Pitt foorball and the NFL for that matter.. Pouncey was brought in to block on the run but not for more carries just to do it better..IMO
Trust me, ive been saying for quite some time the best teams dont necessarily run the ball and play defense in the NFL any longer, the best teams have both offensive passing efficiency and defense against the pass efficiency, but you need to run the ball effectively as well.

The Saints ranked in the top 6 in both running the ball and passing...

You need to have a balance, yet pass first, and Pitt found themselves passing a bit too much and many times not even trying to run the ball...because like you said despite efforts they failed to..
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance

Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-26-2010, 06:00 PM
political gambler
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh and CA
Posts: 1,020
Rewards: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZIGGYSTARDUST View Post
Actually IMO they ran enough but just were not very good at it.. Pitt ran it 428 times and threw 536.. Pretty much NFL average.. Dallas with better backs ran it 436 times and threw it 550.. Even a team like the Vikes with a stud at rb ran it only 467 times (2.5 more a game then Pitt) Peterson is worth the 2 extra carries a game.. Pitt fans have to figure it out .. This is the new NFL with rule changes benefiting the passing game.. Add on the fact you have a QB you are paying 100 million (and by the way had 26 tds &12 ints last year) its makes no sense to go back to 3 yards and a cloud of dust .. Look at the last 4 years in the NFL the good teams all put it up.. As for BBC contention the defense was tired.. Please ... They were suspected to the pass due to Troy and Smiths injuries.. Plus the fact that William Gay was one of the worst DB's in the NFL last year if not the worst.. Franco aint coming bacl people get used to the ball in the air.. They did not draft the likes of Wallace and this years 3rd rounder to block.. They fly.. Its a new era for Pitt foorball and the NFL for that matter.. Pouncey was brought in to block on the run but not for more carries just to do it better..IMO
I understand the rules changes causing a pass happy NFL but my contention about a tired defense comes from an excessive level of three and outs because they lacked the ability to covert short yardage situation (ineffective run blocking/running) and also the inability to shorten the game when you have the lead in the fourth quarter. When you constantly placed a defensive line that average 30+ along with a near 30 linebacker core for an extra 10 to 20 snaps again it takes it toll. Controlling the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball controls the game. If you cant control the line on offensive eventually the defense gets worn down. I am not debating the personnel on the field because as a team the Steelers were able to hide an avg secondary in zones because of pressure. Heck they even made some defenders seem better than they were and reap excessive free agent contracts Mcfadden and Scott come to mind.
That said a defense that relies on pressure must get pressure or face exposure. Problem is constant pressure fatigues even the best conditioned athletes. Also, when the defense is put on the field repeatedly late in the games eventually the will crumble. Has anyone else noticed that the majority of the teams that run a 3-4 defense that predicates its defensive scheme on blitzes and pressure typically have an offense that runs the ball effectively?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-26-2010, 09:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,152
Rewards: 1,089
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burgh Brew Crew View Post
I understand the rules changes causing a pass happy NFL but my contention about a tired defense comes from an excessive level of three and outs because they lacked the ability to covert short yardage situation (ineffective run blocking/running) and also the inability to shorten the game when you have the lead in the fourth quarter. When you constantly placed a defensive line that average 30+ along with a near 30 linebacker core for an extra 10 to 20 snaps again it takes it toll. Controlling the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball controls the game. If you cant control the line on offensive eventually the defense gets worn down. I am not debating the personnel on the field because as a team the Steelers were able to hide an avg secondary in zones because of pressure. Heck they even made some defenders seem better than they were and reap excessive free agent contracts Mcfadden and Scott come to mind.
That said a defense that relies on pressure must get pressure or face exposure. Problem is constant pressure fatigues even the best conditioned athletes. Also, when the defense is put on the field repeatedly late in the games eventually the will crumble. Has anyone else noticed that the majority of the teams that run a 3-4 defense that predicates its defensive scheme on blitzes and pressure typically have an offense that runs the ball effectively?
Agree ... Pitt was horrid when they needed short yardage.. Thats my point also .. They ran enough just were not very good at it.. Got most of their running yards after the passing game opened it up for them with some first down throws.. Agree must get better at it .. Hope new number one helps.. Was hoping they were going to take Brown from USC in the 2nd round and just go all in on the o-line this year.. But opted for a LB.. Maybe why I hated that pick in that place the most..
__________________
2005 CAPPERS MALL COLLEGE BOWL CHAMP
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.