Go Back   Sports Handicapping Forum > Sports Picks > NFL Football
Why all the love for the Packers? Why all the love for the Packers?
Register Rewards Mark Forums Read

NFL Football NFL Handicapping - Post your NFL picks, talk NFL betting, anything NFL.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-06-2011, 03:57 PM
Banned
  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 172
Rewards: 91
Why all the love for the Packers?
Wrong team favoured here folks. From top to bottom, Steelers with more depth, better D, QB with proven playoff credentials. Am I missing something here? Rodgers is going to get owned here today. I would not be suprised to see him knocked out of the game with a thunderous smack down by this steelers D. They (GB) barely beat a rookie 2 weeks ago in Chicago. Now they are facing a 2 time Super Bowl Champ .

Steelers win this game by a TD+

Enjoy the game fellas .
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2011, 01:59 PM
Registered User
  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,878
Rewards: 3,692
bump
__________________
MLB 2012 (6-2 +1755)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:03 PM
the straightshooter
  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: an onrushing tram, on collision course
Posts: 46,828
Rewards: 872
no team has the depth the packers do...2nd and 3rd string players all over the field on Super Bowl

and the Packers dominated the entire game
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance

Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:11 PM
Hall of Fame
  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: texan in nashville
Posts: 29,561
Rewards: 1,159
lol," a thousand smackdowns by this steeler d"

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:26 PM
the straightshooter
  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: an onrushing tram, on collision course
Posts: 46,828
Rewards: 872
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Tator View Post
Wrong team favoured here folks. From top to bottom, Steelers with more depth, better D, QB with proven playoff credentials. Am I missing something here? Rodgers is going to get owned here today. I would not be suprised to see him knocked out of the game with a thunderous smack down by this steelers D. They (GB) barely beat a rookie 2 weeks ago in Chicago. Now they are facing a 2 time Super Bowl Champ .

Steelers win this game by a TD+

Enjoy the game fellas .
do you know why nobody gave a shit when you posted this garbage yesterday

because any Steeler backer with only half a brain respected GB a great deal

not to mention how ridiculous the entire write up was

Cutler isnt a rookie, one

Steelers D was a whole 8 points better, or half a point a game better than the Packers D, two

Despite every bar in america full of obnoxious, hick, no football knowledge, moronic, bandwagon, steeler fans every sunday afternoon

not to say there arent knowledgeable still fans, but the idiots always seem to outnumber the others

despite so many blind followers, linesmakers made the packers 2.5 point favorites, three

the steelers weakness is getting spread out, exactly what Gb can do with their awesome receivers and QB, four



go ask somebody son
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance

Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis
Last edited by Romanowski; 02-08-2011 at 02:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:46 PM
Banned
  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 172
Rewards: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanowski View Post
do you know why nobody gave a shit when you posted this garbage yesterday

because any Steeler backer with only half a brain respected GB a great deal

not to mention how ridiculous the entire write up was

Cutler isnt a rookie, one

Steelers D was a whole 8 points better, or half a point a game better than the Packers D, two

Despite every bar in america full of obnoxious, hick, no football knowledge, moronic, bandwagon, steeler fans every sunday afternoon

not to say there arent knowledgeable still fans, but the idiots always seem to outnumber the others

despite so many blind followers, linesmakers made the packers 2.5 point favorites, three

the steelers weakness is getting spread out, exactly what Gb can do with their awesome receivers and QB, four



go ask somebody son
Chew on this Romo. Was BIG BEN 100% in the Super Bowl game? No he wasn't. If he was, this game would have gone the other way. Pittsburgh would have won the game PERIOD !!!! It all starts at the QB position. Anybody with half a brain knows that. Was BIG BEN 100% during the game? WAS HE ???? NO !!!! Did the Packers win the Super Bowl yes. But the outcome would have been different if BIG BEN was 100% fit for the game. Now that my friend is using logic.

Switch up the scenario. Rodgers with a gimpy foot/leg from the 2nd Q on, who wins the Super Bowl Romo?

Not a very tough question to answer, LOL.

But ya, Rodgers is the man,LOL.

Lets see what Rodgers does in the next 3-5 years, and then we can judge just how good he is. None of this lets jump on the Rodgers band wagon cause he won 1 Super Bowl, LMAO. So did Trent Dilfer, roflmao.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:48 PM
Banned
  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 172
Rewards: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Romanowski View Post
do you know why nobody gave a shit when you posted this garbage yesterday

because any Steeler backer with only half a brain respected GB a great deal

not to mention how ridiculous the entire write up was

Cutler isnt a rookie, one


Steelers D was a whole 8 points better, or half a point a game better than the Packers D, two

Despite every bar in america full of obnoxious, hick, no football knowledge, moronic, bandwagon, steeler fans every sunday afternoon

not to say there arent knowledgeable still fans, but the idiots always seem to outnumber the others

despite so many blind followers, linesmakers made the packers 2.5 point favorites, three

the steelers weakness is getting spread out, exactly what Gb can do with their awesome receivers and QB, four



go ask somebody son
Ya, I forgot, Cutler played the 3rd and 4th Q's .

I guess the kid who came into the game late in the 3rd was an experienced QB .
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:50 PM
Hall of Fame
  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: texan in nashville
Posts: 29,561
Rewards: 1,159
are you really "roflmao"?

maybe take a couple of days off from posting dicktator and come back strong next week
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:54 PM
the straightshooter
  
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: an onrushing tram, on collision course
Posts: 46,828
Rewards: 872
hehe
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance

Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:54 PM
whats yo orda fool
  
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PHILLY
Posts: 29,921
Rewards: 3,299
Rapelisberger did what he does in every game except this time he lost. His big game numbers are nothing special. If they wouldve won everyone wouldve said how great rapelisberger is but the fact is Pitts wins many games in spite of Rapelisberger.IFusing his injury as an excuse is Logic than u didnt watch the game. GB lost there best db and Probably best defensive player in the game they ran only 16 times and if his WRs could catch the ball u r looking at a 2 td win for GB. The score was closer than what the game was. Jesus u make sweetqueef look like Bill Walsh with ur breakdown of that game
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:55 PM
Registered User
  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,296
Rewards: 2,841
Another brilliant Dick thread.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:55 PM
Banned
  
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 172
Rewards: 91
Caleb Hanie, rookie QB for the Bears completed 13/20 passes for 153 yards after coming into the 3rd Q of the game between the Bears and GB Packers. Prior to that he had plays in only 2 games and attempted 14 passes, lol. So ya, I would say he is a rookie. Rodgers was 17 for 30 with 244 yards completed. If the rookie had played the whole game the Bears might of won that game .
Last edited by Dick Tator; 02-08-2011 at 02:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:57 PM
Registered User
  
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,296
Rewards: 2,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Tator View Post
Lets see what Rodgers does in the next 3-5 years, and then we can judge just how good he is. None of this lets jump on the Rodgers band wagon cause he won 1 Super Bowl, LMAO. So did Trent Dilfer, roflmao.
This is dumber that the OP. Even Steeler backers knew Rodgers was dangerous, and is a top QB. Comparing to Dilfer. lol. come on.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:57 PM
Registered User
  
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,878
Rewards: 3,692
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Tator View Post
Ya, I forgot, Cutler played the 3rd and 4th Q's .

I guess the kid who came into the game late in the 3rd was an experienced QB .
Your man crush, brett favre, only has 1 as well. Man you are confused!
__________________
MLB 2012 (6-2 +1755)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-08-2011, 02:58 PM
Hall of Fame
  
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: texan in nashville
Posts: 29,561
Rewards: 1,159
just admit you are wrong about everything dick, admit what we all know
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 3 1 23

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:56 PM.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.