|
|||||||
| NFL Football NFL Handicapping - Post your NFL picks, talk NFL betting, anything NFL. |
| View Poll Results: Who's covering? | |||
| St Lou -1 |
   
|
54 | 69.23% |
| Seattle +1 |
  
|
24 | 30.77% |
| Over 43 |
  
|
13 | 16.67% |
| Under 43 |
  
|
17 | 21.79% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 78. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
12-26-2010, 11:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
***Win and You're In StLou @ Seattle***
I'm starting the hype train early...who yall liking?
|
|
#2
12-27-2010, 07:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
St. Louis -1 for sure. They are at home. They are on a one game winning streak. They have more playmakers and their D can be decent. Seattle is just plain bad. They lost 3 in a row, have regressed as the season went on, and Hasselbeck may be out. I see St. Louis taking this fairly easily.
|
|
#3
12-27-2010, 07:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
leaning rams and over.
|
|
#4
12-27-2010, 07:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
s
t l
__________________
"If I could start my life all over again, I would be a professional football player, and you damn well better believe I would be a Pittsburgh Steeler." -- Jack Lambert --
|
|
#5
12-27-2010, 07:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually I just realized the game is in Seattle. I still think the Rams will take it but it will just be closer now.
|
|
#6
12-27-2010, 11:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
you dont mess with the whitehurst
|
|
#7
12-28-2010, 01:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
If this one was in St. Louis, it would be Rams easily but it is in Seattle. I think the Seahawks will win in a thriller, 23-20.
__________________
NFL----2011: regular season not good, Playoffs: 2-1 +7u 2010: 30-15-2 (66.7%) 2009: 66-41-1 (61.7%) 2008: 50-41-4 (52.3%) NBA streak contest: 49-27-2 (64.5%) Best: 7 As of Mar. 24 2012
|
|
#8
12-29-2010, 06:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#9
12-30-2010, 12:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Line at 3 right now, I like the 'Gulls.
__________________
2-3 Zone Defense.
|
|
#10
12-30-2010, 01:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am very impressed by Bradford and the team overall. I simply can't trust Whitehurst, he is terrible and Seattle as a whole are a very tough team to trust with money on the line.
__________________
"A Pat On The Back Is Only 8" Away From A Kick In The Ass"
|
|
#11
12-30-2010, 01:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rams win the worst division in the NFL and get eliminated first round in playoffs.
|
|
#12
12-30-2010, 02:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
if this were in st louis think it's rams all the way...who knows in seattle
either way, **** both these losers lol
|
|
#13
12-30-2010, 02:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the home field advantage for Seattle may be enough to give them a slight edge here. You know that the Saints are pulling for the Rams because they would much rather play indoors in St. Louis than outdoors in Seattle.
__________________
"Now I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." George Patton. I am a winner because I make the other poor dumb bastards lose.
|
|
#14
12-30-2010, 04:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lambs are clearly the superior team...but Seattle is a much different team at home. That and a dome team is traveling 2,000 miles with a high temp of 41 for the day. It's a night game so expect 30's easy.
Unfortunately, Seaf@gs probably take this one...even with Whitehurst.
__________________
War Seagull...QUACK QUACK!!!
|
|
#15
12-30-2010, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Sorry, I never should have used the word "superior" when talking about any of the NFC West teams. My bad. 
__________________
War Seagull...QUACK QUACK!!!
|
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 PM.
