|
|||||||
| NBA Basketball NBA Handicapping - Post your NBA picks, talk NBA betting, anything NBA. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
05-26-2011, 12:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which format do you prefer for the finals?
2-3-2
or 2-2-1-1-1 Prefer the 2nd one. They do it for the 1st 3 rounds really don't understand the reasoning for changing it. I think the travel excuse is BS considering how many 2-3 day breaks there has been in the playoffs and even in the Eastern/Western finals.
__________________
Its all about the U 2011-12 NBA: 132-99-5 2012 NBA Playoffs: 34-31-1 
|
|
#2
05-26-2011, 12:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
dallas in 6
__________________
The only bridge I've ever burned along this legacy I dance is the one that linked the cities of prosperity and chance Check out Technicapping for quantitative sport analysis
|
|
#3
05-26-2011, 12:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
no playoffs at all...the team with best record during the season wins the championship
|
|
#4
05-26-2011, 01:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
2-3-2 is better for some reason. If a team goes down 0-2 and they have 3 coming at home I think its a different mind set altogether. I've always preferred the 2-3-2 in any sport...especially in the finals.
|
|
#5
05-26-2011, 09:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
its should be a 2-2-1-1-1, the 2-3-2 format is so stupid.
I hate shit like that. you play the whole ****in playoffs in a certain format then just change it in the finals. and dont even get me started on baseball......
__________________
one thing ive learned is, never let anyone hooskow ya! -the great chili dog 2006 NBA Playoff Contest Champion
|
|
#6
05-26-2011, 10:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Finals format
2-3-2 format is just bs.. The fact that the team that does not have home court will get 3 games before the home court team does is not right...
2006 finals.. Mavs up 2-0.. Game 3 was so controversial, game 4 was a blow out.. Mavs coming back home to refocus would have been huge for game 5..but instead Miami gets another game there.. Just seems unfair.. When both teams win at home and the team without home court gets a 3rd game at home
|
|
#7
05-26-2011, 10:43 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
2-2-1-1-1-1 is way better imo.
__________________
MLB 2012 (6-2 +1755)
|
|
#8
05-26-2011, 11:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree with most in here. 2-2-1-1-1 is the fairest way to do it.
__________________
"Now I want you to remember that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." George Patton. I am a winner because I make the other poor dumb bastards lose.
|
|
#9
05-26-2011, 11:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
2-2-1-1-1...
__________________
N/A
|
|
#10
05-26-2011, 01:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree, the 2-3-2 is horrible and to me is just plain stupid. IF you do the first 3 rounds in the 2-2-1-1-1 format, stick with it in the final!
Personally, I do prefer the 2-2-1-1-1 format as I think it is how the best of 7 should work. You get no arguments from anyone in hockey who uses it for the finals.
__________________
"A Pat On The Back Is Only 8" Away From A Kick In The Ass"
|
|
#11
05-26-2011, 02:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
22111
232 leaves too much opportunity for the team w/o home court/field...
__________________
Where'd who go!?! (Hollywood - Top Gun) F Tom Hicks
|
|
#12
05-26-2011, 08:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
i think the 2-3-2 gives an advantage to the team without homecourt advantage ....
i like 2-2-1-1-1 much better
|
|
#13
05-26-2011, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I prefer 2-2-1-1-1, but its all about the almighty dollar, wayyy to expensive to pack all the tv equipment on those later games back to back to back, that's why its done.
__________________
Don't care if its fixed, as long as I'm on the right side of the fix 
|
|
#14
05-26-2011, 09:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
2,2,1,1,1...i like the change of atmosphere and the crowd intensity.
|
|
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.
