Go Back   Sports Handicapping Forum > Sports Picks > NFL Football > Fantasy Football

Fantasy Football Talk about fantasy football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: delaware
Posts: 12,252
Rewards: 2,273
Romo is done, so here are my options

Stafford
Fitzpatrick
Bradford
Freeman
Cassel



I'm leaning towards Stafford, but Fitzpatrick I think has the easier schedule.

What do you think?
__________________
USE YOUR MIND, NOT YOUR HEART!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-25-2010, 10:51 PM
1 a day avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 4,543
Rewards: 1,224
Bradford or Fitzpatrick
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2010, 01:02 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 7,450
Rewards: 228
Stafford without a doubt
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2010, 01:08 AM
Mod-A-Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: rochester ny
Posts: 15,800
Rewards: 1,725
Stafford all day.

Sleeper: Moore
__________________
DEFIANCE

"The Great One"

W-I-N
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-26-2010, 10:27 AM
Warming up.
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Under the bridge downtown
Posts: 2,410
Rewards: 727
I have the same problem in one league. I have set my waiver que

Stafford
Bradford
Fitzpatrick
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-26-2010, 03:18 PM
political gambler
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh and CA
Posts: 1,020
Rewards: 236
I would go with Fitzpatrick until the shine wears off. He has been consistent all season and the passing game will be a huge part of their offense as they will be playing from behind all season.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-26-2010, 03:27 PM
CM Hall Of Fame 2008
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 37,614
Rewards: 3,310
Stafford. Easily.

I had Romo, but fortunately had kept Stafford all along as my back-up. I have no worries. Look at the numbers Shaun Hill was putting up in that offense. Any doubt that Stafford can exceed those numbers ?

Freeman second choice. Consistent numbers.

As for Fitz--why anyone would want an Ivy leaguer who will be playing in the Buffalo winter is beyond me
__________________
Seth: Gimme that. Alright, you look like a future pedophile in this picture, number 1. Number 2: it doesn't even have a first name, it just says "McLovin"!
Evan: What? One name? ONE NAME!?!? Who are you? Seal?
Seth: Fogell, this ID says that you're 25 years old. Why wouldn't you just put 21, man?
Fogell: Seth, Seth, Seth. Listen up, ass-face: every day, hundreds of kids go into the liquor store with fake IDs, and every single one says they're 21. Pssh, how many 21 year olds do you think there are in this town? It's called f*cking strategy, alright?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-26-2010, 03:31 PM
Nectar of the Gods
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chattanooga
Posts: 17,364
Rewards: 2,755
Look at the Chief's remaining schedule before you pass on Cassel.
Over his last four games, he's averaged 200 passing yards while throwing for eight touchdowns and just one interception.

Not bad... I may drop Cutler and pick up Cassel myself.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-26-2010, 04:11 PM
Riverboat Gambler
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mississippi Delta
Posts: 4,771
Rewards: 450
agree w/Bob - Cassel is not a bad option imo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-26-2010, 04:14 PM
whats yo orda fool
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PHILLY
Posts: 29,922
Rewards: 3,304
cassel has been very good the ast few weeks
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-26-2010, 04:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: delaware
Posts: 12,252
Rewards: 2,273
I put in a claim for Stafford, but worried a guy with a waiver claim before will get him. I will move onto Fitzpatrick or Freeman if I don't get Stafford.
__________________
USE YOUR MIND, NOT YOUR HEART!!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-26-2010, 04:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: delaware
Posts: 12,252
Rewards: 2,273
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Stafford. Easily.

I had Romo, but fortunately had kept Stafford all along as my back-up. I have no worries. Look at the numbers Shaun Hill was putting up in that offense. Any doubt that Stafford can exceed those numbers ?

Freeman second choice. Consistent numbers.

As for Fitz--why anyone would want an Ivy leaguer who will be playing in the Buffalo winter is beyond me

I know who would want a QB on the worst team??? However, he seems to have something going in Buffalo. They are always playing from behind, but has some impressive numbers.
__________________
USE YOUR MIND, NOT YOUR HEART!!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-26-2010, 07:46 PM
CM Hall Of Fame 2008
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 37,614
Rewards: 3,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by walk066 View Post
I know who would want a QB on the worst team??? However, he seems to have something going in Buffalo. They are always playing from behind, but has some impressive numbers.

I know Fitzpatrick has done well, but when it turns real cold in Buffalo, his numbers will drop. Just ask Trossi. He knows a thing or two about upstate NY winters.
__________________
Seth: Gimme that. Alright, you look like a future pedophile in this picture, number 1. Number 2: it doesn't even have a first name, it just says "McLovin"!
Evan: What? One name? ONE NAME!?!? Who are you? Seal?
Seth: Fogell, this ID says that you're 25 years old. Why wouldn't you just put 21, man?
Fogell: Seth, Seth, Seth. Listen up, ass-face: every day, hundreds of kids go into the liquor store with fake IDs, and every single one says they're 21. Pssh, how many 21 year olds do you think there are in this town? It's called f*cking strategy, alright?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.